An AI assistant for lawyers
Takes over the first pass through contracts and the drafting of standard documents.
What it does
- reads a contract and flags the clauses that work against your side
- prepares standard documents: claims, notices, powers of attorney
- assembles the relevant law and case practice on a specific question
- keeps a contract register with terms and renewal dates
- turns legal text into an explanation colleagues can follow
What it does not do
The limits are set in advance
- does not give an opinion on a contested case in place of a real lawyer
- does not represent you in court and does not sign documents
How much time it frees up
By our reviews, a lawyer spends roughly
13 hours a week on the routine listed above — more than a third of the working week. The assistant does not take all of it: some tasks you will still be checking. But checking something finished is faster than doing it from scratch, and the gain lies in exactly that difference.
How it works
The assistant works with your own documents and exports rather than abstract examples. The checking rules are written once and then applied identically every time — which is exactly its advantage over a tired person at the end of a quarter.
What an ordinary day looks like
The main load on a company lawyer is not court but a stream of similar documents. Contracts arrive from counterparties in their own wording, and each one has to be read in full to find the three or four places where the terms differ from your usual ones. The assistant goes through the document first and points to exactly those places: changed payment terms, unilateral termination, liability, jurisdiction.
Then comes the comparison with your template. The assistant breaks the contract down into clauses and marks what has been added, what has been removed and what has been reworded in a way that changes the meaning. Near-identical phrasings that the eye slides past on the fifth contract of the day get the same attention in the first and in the twentieth.
A separate part of the day is standard replies: counterparty enquiries, extension letters, claims following the same pattern. The assistant prepares a draft reply from your own model text, so you edit the substance rather than assembling the text again.
What we need from you at the start
- Your contract and letter templates — from them the assistant learns what is normal for you and what is a deviation.
- A list of terms you never accept: the assistant will raise those regardless of how they are worded.
- A few examples of agreed contracts with your amendments — they show where you tend to concede and where you hold firm.
- An understanding of who decides on disputed clauses: the assistant prepares a position, but it needs a defined addressee.
How the rollout goes
- Working through the tasks: we pick the areas with the highest volume and the most repetition — usually reviewing incoming contracts and standard correspondence.
- Setup: we load the templates and the red-line terms, build the assistant and test it on contracts you have already agreed — you can see immediately whether its comments match yours.
- Testing on the live stream: for a week the assistant reads contracts alongside you. Anything it missed or raised needlessly is clarified in the rules.
- Handover: we show you how to add new red-line terms and leave you the instructions.
Frequently asked questions
Is this a replacement for a lawyer?
No, and we will not promise that. The assistant takes over reading and comparing — the work where attentiveness is what matters. The legal position, negotiations and anything contentious stay with you.
No, and we will not promise that. The assistant takes over reading and comparing — the work where attentiveness is what matters. The legal position, negotiations and anything contentious stay with you.
Can it sign documents?
No. The assistant prepares drafts and comments; signing and sending are done by a human only.
No. The assistant prepares drafts and comments; signing and sending are done by a human only.
How accurately does it find changed wording?
On standard contracts, reliably, because the comparison is against your own template. On non-standard documents it openly flags the places it is unsure about instead of pretending it understood everything.
On standard contracts, reliably, because the comparison is against your own template. On non-standard documents it openly flags the places it is unsure about instead of pretending it understood everything.
Our contracts are confidential.
The assistant works with the files you give it and within your infrastructure. We agree how things are stored before the work begins, not after.
The assistant works with the files you give it and within your infrastructure. We agree how things are stored before the work begins, not after.
Where should we start if the volume is small?
With reviewing incoming contracts. Even at ten documents a month that saves noticeable time, and the risk of missing a clause drops straight away.
With reviewing incoming contracts. Even at ten documents a month that saves noticeable time, and the risk of missing a clause drops straight away.
When you do not need an assistant
If your contracts are bespoke and written from scratch for each deal, the gain will be small: there is nothing to compare against and you will have to read everything anyway. The same goes for litigation — there the position and the case law decide, not reading speed. An assistant pays off where documents resemble one another and arrive in a stream: incoming counterparty contracts, standard correspondence, extensions and repetitive claims. If your monthly stream is two or three documents, it is fairer to say so up front: wait until the volume grows.
What changes after a month
The first thing people notice is that the fear of missing a line in someone else's wording goes away. A contract arrives with the differences already marked, and reading turns into checking decisions rather than searching. The second is that standard correspondence stops piling up towards the end of the week. The freed-up time usually goes not to new tasks but to the ones there was never time for: tidying up the templates, going through old contracts, writing internal rules.
What it costs
Task review and configuration of one assistantfrom ₽12,000 (≈ $142)
An extra task beyond the basic fivefrom ₽3,000 (≈ $36)
Training for you or a member of stafffrom ₽5,000 (≈ $59)
Support and adjustments, per monthfrom ₽4,000 (≈ $47)
Build an assistant like this
Tell us which tasks eat the most of your time, and we will say which of them are worth handing to an assistant first and which are better kept for yourself.
Message our Telegram bot — instant reply
or leave a request via the form below — we reply within 30 minutes